Coyote Logistics vs Landstar: Carrier-Friendly Broker Battle

80Very Good

Coyote Logistics

Average Score

82Very Good

Landstar

Average Score

Winner: Landstar

Category Breakdown

Carrier Treatment

Landstar wins

Coyote Logistics78

Landstar88

Landstar's agent model treats carriers as partners rather than commodities. Their agents build long-term carrier relationships and provide consistent freight. Coyote's high-volume model can feel more transactional, though individual reps vary.

Load Quality

Landstar wins

Coyote Logistics80

Landstar85

Landstar's network includes high-quality contract freight from established shippers. Coyote (owned by UPS) also has excellent shipper relationships but their spot market focus means more variable load quality.

Payment Speed

Coyote Logistics wins

Coyote Logistics82

Landstar78

Coyote offers competitive quick-pay options and generally processes payments efficiently. Landstar pays through their agent network, which can add a step. Both are reliable payers but Coyote's corporate systems are slightly faster.

Technology

Coyote Logistics wins

Coyote Logistics85

Landstar72

Coyote's CoyoteGO platform provides a modern digital experience for load search, booking, and tracking. Landstar's technology is improving but their agent-driven model means more phone and email interaction.

Freight Consistency

Landstar wins

Coyote Logistics75

Landstar88

Landstar agents who know your lanes and equipment can provide remarkably consistent freight. Coyote's technology-driven matching is efficient but relationships are less personal. For carriers wanting steady freight, Landstar's agent model wins.

Score Summary

Category	Coyote Logistics	Landstar	Leader
Carrier Treatment	78	88	Landstar
Load Quality	80	85	Landstar
Payment Speed	82	78	Coyote Logistics
Technology	85	72	Coyote Logistics
Freight Consistency	75	88	Landstar
Overall Average	80	82	Landstar

Our Verdict

Landstar wins for carriers who value relationships, load quality, and freight consistency. Their agent model creates genuine partnerships that produce better freight over time. Carriers who invest in Landstar agent relationships are rewarded with first-call status on premium loads.

Coyote wins for carriers who prefer a technology-first experience with quick load matching and efficient processes. Their UPS backing provides financial stability and access to a massive shipper network.

Build Landstar agent relationships for your core lanes. Use Coyote for filling gaps and backhauls when your Landstar agent does not have a match.

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Landstar's carrier services or reach out to individual Landstar agents. You need active MC authority, insurance, and a clean safety record. Building a relationship with a specific Landstar agent who handles freight in your preferred lanes is the key to consistent loads.

Yes, UPS acquired Coyote Logistics in 2015. This gives Coyote access to UPS's massive shipper network and financial resources. The UPS backing makes Coyote one of the most financially stable brokers in the industry.

Rates vary by lane and timing. Landstar's contract freight tends to be more stable and slightly higher on average. Coyote's spot market rates fluctuate more but can spike higher during tight capacity. Neither consistently outpays the other across all lanes.

Need Help Choosing?

Browse our in-depth reviews, use our free comparison tools, and check out our calculators to find the right products for your trucking business.

Browse All Reviews

More Head-to-Head Comparisons

fleet management

Coyote Logistics vs Landstar: Carrier-Friendly Broker Battle